Re: BUG: CR marker ^M doesn't show up in '-' lines of diffs when the ending of the removed line is CR+LF
Junio C Hamano
Johannes Sixt
brian m. carlson
Frank Schäfer
See Also
Prev Ref 1 Ref 2 Ref 3 Ref 4 Ref 5 Ref 6 Ref 7 Ref 8 Ref 9 Ref 10 Ref 11
2018-12-05 19:43:03 UTC

Am 03.12.18 um 02:15 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> Frank Schäfer <> writes:
>> Hi Junio,
>> Am 29.11.18 um 03:11 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>> [...]
>>> This was misspoken a bit.  Let's revise it to
>>>  	When producing a colored output (not limited to whitespace
>>>  	error coloring of diff output) for contents that are not
>>>  	marked as eol=crlf (and other historical means), insert
>>>  	<RESET> before a CR that comes immediately before a LF.
>> You mean
>>      ...
>>      <RESET> *after* a CR that comes immediately before a LF."
>> OK, AFAICS this produces the desired output in all cases if eol=lf.
> OK, yeah, I think I meant "after", i.e. ... CR <RESET> LF, in order
> to force CR to be separated from LF.
>> Now what about the case eol=crlf ?
> I have no strong opinions, other than that "LF in repository, CRLF
> in working tree" would make the issue go away (when it is solved for
> EOL=LF like the above, that is).
>> Keeping the current behavior of '-' lines is correct.
>> But shouldn't ^M now be suppressed in '+' lines for a consistent behavior ?
> If "LF in repository, CRLF in working tree" is done, there would not
> be ^M at the end of the line, not just for removed lines, but also
> for added lines, no?
Just to be sure that I'm not missing anything here:
What's your definition of "LF in repository, CRLF in working tree" in
terms of config parameters ?