[PATCH v3 0/3] make sure stash refreshes the index properly
To
git@vger.kernel.org
Cc
Junio C Hamano
Joel Teichroeb
Johannes Schindelin
Jeff King
Martin Ă…gren
Thomas Gummerer
From
Thomas Gummerer
See Also
Prev
Date
2019-09-03 19:10:38 UTC
Thanks Martin and Junio for the comments on the previous round.

Changes compared to the previous round:
- Document that when failing to refresh the index, the result won't be
  written to disk.
- Rollback the lock file if refreshing the index fails, so we don't
  end up with a lock file that can't be rolled back or committed after
  the function returns
- Some small tweaks in the commit message and documentation of the
  function.

Range-diff below:

1:  1f25fe227c ! 1:  7cc9f5fff4 factor out refresh_and_write_cache function
    @@ Commit message
         factor out refresh_and_write_cache function
     
         Getting the lock for the index, refreshing it and then writing it is a
    -    pattern that happens more than once throughout the codebase.  Factor
    -    out the refresh_and_write_cache function from builtin/am.c to
    -    read-cache.c, so it can be re-used in other places in a subsequent
    -    commit.
    +    pattern that happens more than once throughout the codebase, and isn't
    +    trivial to get right.  Factor out the refresh_and_write_cache function
    +    from builtin/am.c to read-cache.c, so it can be re-used in other
    +    places in a subsequent commit.
     
         Note that we return different error codes for failing to refresh the
         cache, and failing to write the index.  The current caller only cares
    @@ cache.h: void fill_stat_cache_info(struct index_state *istate, struct cache_entr
     + * 'COMMIT_LOCK | write_flags' is passed to 'write_locked_index()', so
     + * the lockfile is always either committed or rolled back.
     + *
    -+ * Return 1 if refreshing the cache failed, -1 if writing the cache to
    -+ * disk failed, 0 on success.
    ++ * Return 1 if refreshing the index returns an error, -1 if writing
    ++ * the index to disk fails, 0 on success.
    ++ *
    ++ * Note that if refreshing the index returns an error, we don't write
    ++ * the result to disk.
     + */
     +int repo_refresh_and_write_index(struct repository*, unsigned int refresh_flags, unsigned int write_flags, const struct pathspec *, char *seen, const char *header_msg);
     +
    @@ read-cache.c: static void show_file(const char * fmt, const char * name, int in_
     +	struct lock_file lock_file = LOCK_INIT;
     +
     +	repo_hold_locked_index(repo, &lock_file, LOCK_DIE_ON_ERROR);
    -+	if (refresh_index(repo->index, refresh_flags, pathspec, seen, header_msg))
    ++	if (refresh_index(repo->index, refresh_flags, pathspec, seen, header_msg)) {
    ++		rollback_lock_file(&lock_file);
     +		return 1;
    ++	}
     +	if (write_locked_index(repo->index, &lock_file, COMMIT_LOCK | write_flags))
     +		return -1;
     +	return 0;
2:  148a65d649 = 2:  0367d938b1 merge: use refresh_and_write_cache
3:  e0f6815192 = 3:  8ed3df9fec stash: make sure to write refreshed cache

Thomas Gummerer (3):
  factor out refresh_and_write_cache function
  merge: use refresh_and_write_cache
  stash: make sure to write refreshed cache

 builtin/am.c     | 16 ++--------------
 builtin/merge.c  | 13 +++----------
 builtin/stash.c  | 11 +++++++----
 cache.h          | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 read-cache.c     | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 t/t3903-stash.sh | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 6 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

-- 
2.23.0.rc2.194.ge5444969c9