Re: [PATCH v5] gitweb: redacted e-mail addresses feature.
Junio C Hamano
Georgios Kontaxis
Georgios Kontaxis via GitGitGadget
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
brian m. carlson
Eric Wong
See Also
Prev Ref 1 Ref 2 Ref 3 Ref 4
2021-04-08 21:19:04 UTC
Junio C Hamano <> wrote:
> Eric Wong <> writes:
> > As a data point, none of the homograph@ candidates I posted here
> > on Mar 29 have attracted any attempts on my mail server.
> That is an interesting observation.  All homograph@ non-addresses,
> if a human corrected the funnies in their spelling, would have hit
> whoever handles mailboxes.
> I take it to mean that as a future direction, replacing <redacted>
> with the obfuscated-but-readable-by-humans homographs is a likely
> improvement that would help human users while still inconveniencing
> the crawlers.  It may however need some provision to prevent casual
> end-users from cutting-and-pasting these homographs, as you said in
> your original mention of the homograph approach.

Yes, exactly.

> But other than that, does the patch look reasonable?

I only took a cursory glance at it, but v6 seemed fine.